Progress
On track or target met
On track or target met

Sub-categories

Choose categories from the dropdowns below to see different breakdowns of the data. Some will not be available until a higher level is chosen.

Download headline data (.csv) Download source data (.csv)

Download source data for disaggregations (.csv)

Headline data

Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved budget, by sector (or by budget codes or similar)
Year Value Units Series GeoCode
2013 91.22 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2022 105.06 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2020 99.79 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2021 101.01 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2015 95.46 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2014 98.26 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2011 96.27 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2016 94.36 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2012 97.69 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2010 100.0 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2017 97.52 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2019 106.56 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2018 99.46 % Expenditure settled by the regional administration in relation to the budgeted expenditure
2012 93.03 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2011 100.45 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2019 100.27 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2020 93.84 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2010 110.23 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2018 97.17 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2022 100.26 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2013 100.2 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2017 96.78 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2021 99.22 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2016 97.37 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2014 98.47 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget
2015 98.05 % Liquidated expenditure of the municipalities in proportion to the originally approved budget

Geographical Area:

Unit of Measurement:

Footnote:

Methodological sheet of the indicator available for the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country.

Available indicator

Liquidated expenditure in proportion to the initial expenditure of the budgets of regional and local public administrations
Target

16.6 Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels
Goal

16- Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Definition

Liquidated expenditure in proportion to the initial expenditure of the budgets of regional and local public administrations
Theoretical formula

\(PG_{public\, aministration}^{t} = \frac{GL_{public\, administration}^{t}}{GI_{public\, administration}^{t}} \cdot 100\)

where:

$GL_{public\, administration}^{t} =$ total expenditure on the settlement of consolidated budgets of the public administration (autonomous administration or local administration) in year $t$

$GI_{public\, administration}^{t} =$ total expenditure in the initial consolidated budget of the public administration (autonomous administration or local administration) in year $t$
Frequency

Annual
Observations

The consolidated data are taken after being cleaned from IFL (local financial intermediation) and CAP (common agricultural policy).
OCECA Logo OCECAS

Indicator calculated using a methodology harmonised across the central statistical bodies of the autonomous communities
Data last updated 2025/06/16
Metadata last updated 2025/06/18

This section provides more information about the United Nations indicator or the European Union Sustainable Development Indicator, such as its rationale, international results, metadata, and other relevant statistics.

Rationale

The indicator attempts to capture the reliability of government budgets: do governments spend what they intend to and do they collect what they set out to collect?

It is a simple and intuitive indicator that is easily understood and the methodology is transparent and every rating easily verifiable.

Source: United Nations Statistics Division
Comparability between the available indicator and the UN indicator

The available indicator complies with United Nations metadata.
Link to UN metadata

Metadata 16-6-1.pdf
Back to top